[postgis-devel] 2.0.2

[Paragon Corporation]

Oh yah.  Hmm did I forget to set that up.  I guess she's just building the
binaries but not testing them.

I've ticketed so I don't forget and will tackle this weekend.

http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/2098

I don't think Debbie bothers testing 2.0 except on 9.0 so probably should
add the others to the list at some point for her too.

Thanks,
Regina

 

-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of dustymugs
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 3:22 PM
To: postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] 2.0.2

Heh.  Any way for winnie to do 2.0 regression tests?

-bborie

On 11/16/2012 12:18 PM, Paragon Corporation wrote:
> -1 (can we wait a week)
> 
> 
> Given that there are so many tickets still open under 2.0.2, I'd feel 
> better if we moved them to 2.1.0 or  2.0.3 first Or decide we need to 
> fix before release.
> 
> 
> Cough cough  :) I'd also feel better if we had an RC this time.  It's 
> hard for me to take anything seriously (that has been sitting for 5 
> months) that doesn't have an Rc.
> 
> Also I haven't looked at 2.0 in a while so concerned that some changes 
> aren't so minor that I wouldn't want to do a couple regress checks  
> before we mark it golden.  E.g. making sure the extension upgrade 
> plumbing actually works going from 2.0.1 to 2.0.2
> 
> Thanks,
> Regina
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 11/16/2012 10:27 AM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>> We're 5 months out from 2.0.1 and have quite a long list of fixes in 
>> place now... calling for 2.0.2?
>>
>> http://svn.osgeo.org/postgis/branches/2.0/NEWS
>>
>> P.
>> __
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
> 
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel